All photos are courtesy of lovely and talented MrsW. Her ring finger size is 6, for reference. <img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/cool.gif'' alt='''' /> <img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/smile.gif'' alt='''' /> Here's a link to the original thread: ''Ok, I just could not stand it anymore..... ''
[color:''blue''] I had to see the H & A round for myself and all the different sizes as well. I ordered all the sizes (I think), through size 2.75. I took some pictures of all the asha's together to try and help show the size difference. I know we have that picture of the different size diamonds set in rings on a ladies hand, so I thought I would try and do the same but with loose stones. I have no idea whose dry, old looking hands are in my pictures, and yes the camera does add 10 pounds!
Here are the sizes in the photo. .50, .75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.50, 2.0, 2.75.
I feel like there is a big visual difference between the .50 and the .75.
Not that much visual difference between the .75 to the 1.00 and the 1.0 to the 1.25. I even think there is not too much of a difference between the 1.25 and the 1.50
Now there is a bigger difference between the 1.5 to the 2.0 and the 2.00 to the biggie 2.75.
If one was trying to decide between the 1.0 and the 1.25 go for the 1.25, small difference and it might help with the ''shrinkage'' factor
trying to decide between the 1.25 and the 1.50, I think the same go 1.50, small difference and will help with shrinkage.
Sorry my pictures are not that good, but here we go. [/color]
<img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/drool.png'' alt='''' /> <img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/love.gif'' alt='''' /> <img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/cool.gif'' alt='''' />
[color:''blue''] I had to see the H & A round for myself and all the different sizes as well. I ordered all the sizes (I think), through size 2.75. I took some pictures of all the asha's together to try and help show the size difference. I know we have that picture of the different size diamonds set in rings on a ladies hand, so I thought I would try and do the same but with loose stones. I have no idea whose dry, old looking hands are in my pictures, and yes the camera does add 10 pounds!
Here are the sizes in the photo. .50, .75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.50, 2.0, 2.75.
I feel like there is a big visual difference between the .50 and the .75.
Not that much visual difference between the .75 to the 1.00 and the 1.0 to the 1.25. I even think there is not too much of a difference between the 1.25 and the 1.50
Now there is a bigger difference between the 1.5 to the 2.0 and the 2.00 to the biggie 2.75.
If one was trying to decide between the 1.0 and the 1.25 go for the 1.25, small difference and it might help with the ''shrinkage'' factor
trying to decide between the 1.25 and the 1.50, I think the same go 1.50, small difference and will help with shrinkage.
Sorry my pictures are not that good, but here we go. [/color]
<img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/drool.png'' alt='''' /> <img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/love.gif'' alt='''' /> <img src=''http://talk.jewelry/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/graemlins/default/cool.gif'' alt='''' />
Last edited by a moderator:
